| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Langley Rivermen | BCHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Merritt Centennials | BCHL | 56 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 0.304 | 0.1170 | 0.1279 | 0.4418 | 0.4831 |
| 2016-17 | Merritt Centennials | BCHL | 47 | 14 | 22 | 36 | 0.766 | 0.2951 | 0.3076 | 1.1148 | 1.1619 |
| 2017-18 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 58 | 19 | 29 | 48 | 0.828 | 0.4882 | 0.4748 | 2.4856 | 2.4174 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Miami | D1 | NCHC | — | 24 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.375 |
| 2020-21 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC | SO | 29 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 0.621 |
| 2018-19 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC | FR | 36 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 0.417 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.