IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Wickman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 44 3 8 11 0.250 0.0990 0.0961 0.2625 0.2548
2008-09 — NAHL 49 21 20 41 0.837 0.3315 0.3053 0.8785 0.8092
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 26 8 10 18 0.692
2011-12 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 21 3 7 10 0.476
2010-11 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 27 9 11 20 0.741
2009-10 Williams D3 — FR 24 0 2 2 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2009-10 · Williams
-56.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22979
Forward overall
#810
Forward born in 1988
#1727
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hayden Stocks
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bullard
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.