IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Harris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 — NAHL 47 13 19 32 0.681 0.2528 0.2459 0.7209 0.7013
2008-09 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 53 9 23 32 0.604 0.2242 0.2070 0.6393 0.5902
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 26 16 8 24 0.923
2011-12 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 28 9 9 18 0.643
2010-11 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 23 1 2 3 0.130
2006-07 Saint Michael's D2 — SR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2005-06 Saint Michael's D2 — JR 17 0 3 3 0.176
2004-05 Saint Michael's D2 — SO 18 0 1 1 0.056
2003-04 Saint Michael's D2 — FR 11 1 2 3 0.273

NCAAe Rankings

#16080
Forward overall
#691
Forward born in 1988
#1248
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brodie Tutton
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Korona
Trinity · 2021-22
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Roepke
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.