IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thor Hansen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 — EHL 41 8 20 28 0.683 0.0999 0.1009 0.3348 0.3381
2023-24 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 36 12 18 30 0.833 0.1219 0.1169 0.4086 0.3920
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast SO 24 10 13 23 0.958
2024-25 Keene State D3 LittleEast — 24 9 8 17 0.708
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2024-25 · Keene State
+648.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18579
Forward overall
#943
Forward born in 2003
#381
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny O'Donnell
Aurora · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Zierke
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.