IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Ladd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Marquette Rangers NAHL 57 9 20 29 0.509 0.1807 0.1890 0.5342 0.5586
2008-09 Marquette Rangers NAHL 56 17 31 48 0.857 0.3044 0.3032 0.8999 0.8964
2009-10 Marquette Rangers NAHL 55 23 40 63 1.145 0.4069 0.3890 1.2027 1.1497
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 29 10 17 27 0.931
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 30 20 22 42 1.400
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 26 7 15 22 0.846
2011-12 Bemidji State D1 — SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Bemidji State D1 — FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#10993
Forward overall
#392
Forward born in 1989
#311
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payden Benning
Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anders Grongstad
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.