| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | New York Bobcats | EHL | 29 | 3 | 19 | 22 | 0.759 | 0.1752 | 0.1969 | 0.3712 | 0.4171 |
| 2016-17 | New Jersey Jr. Titans | NAHL | 55 | 12 | 31 | 43 | 0.782 | 0.2872 | 0.3040 | 0.8252 | 0.8736 |
| 2017-18 | Central Illinois Flying Aces | USHL | 56 | 12 | 31 | 43 | 0.768 | 0.4530 | 0.4431 | 2.3063 | 2.2557 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC | — | 31 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.710 |
| 2021-22 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC | — | 22 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 1.046 |
| 2020-21 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC | — | 24 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 0.833 |
| 2018-19 | Cornell | D1 | ECAC | — | 22 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.455 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.