IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Kenney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Mahoning Valley Phantoms NAHL 53 8 12 20 0.377 0.1341 0.1312 0.3981 0.3895
2008-09 Mahoning Valley Phantoms NAHL 49 19 16 35 0.714 0.2538 0.2358 0.7534 0.6998
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 20 3 5 8 0.400
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 29 7 4 11 0.379
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 27 6 4 10 0.370
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 24 3 3 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+50.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24168
Forward overall
#842
Forward born in 1988
#1824
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colton Alexander
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McCann
Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Sgarbossa
SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.