IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jascha Pettit Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 43 9 8 17 0.395 0.1452 0.1424 0.4172 0.4092
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 26 8 12 20 0.769
2011-12 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 24 14 6 20 0.833
2010-11 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 17 3 1 4 0.235
2009-10 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 19 6 5 11 0.579
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2009-10 · Saint John's
+374.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35230
Forward overall
#1188
Forward born in 1988
#3517
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Bowles
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Zembrzycki
Morrisville · 2022-23
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.