← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hans Forselius Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pomfret NE-Prep 30 0 3 3 0.100 0.0198 0.0198 0.0456 0.0456
2019-20 Pomfret NE-Prep 28 0 1 1 0.036 0.0071 0.0071 0.0163 0.0163
2021-22 Seahawks Hockey EHL 19 7 8 15 0.789 0.1824 0.1852 0.3863 0.3923
2022-23 Seahawks Hockey EHL 40 11 12 23 0.575 0.1328 0.1280 0.2813 0.2711
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 25 7 8 15 0.600
2024-25 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 25 4 7 11 0.440
2023-24 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 25 3 10 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2023-24 · St. Michael's College
+302.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28022
Forward overall
#1626
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2007-08
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.