IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric McLintock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 50 10 6 16 0.320 0.1176 0.1200 0.3378 0.3446
2008-09 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 48 11 13 24 0.500 0.1837 0.1783 0.5278 0.5123
2009-10 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 57 22 22 44 0.772 0.2836 0.2639 0.8147 0.7581
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 19 3 2 5 0.263
2010-11 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 16 2 3 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2010-11 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+59.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23412
Forward overall
#788
Forward born in 1989
#1777
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dominic Thomas
Hamline · 2024-25
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gordon Bell
SUNY Potsdam · 2000-01
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roman Gaudet
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.