IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean McNeely Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 29 1 3 4 0.138 0.0507 0.0499 0.1456 0.1434
2008-09 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 54 7 24 31 0.574 0.2109 0.1972 0.6060 0.5667
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 5 1 2 3 0.600
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 24 3 4 7 0.292
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 15 0 2 2 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
2.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9956
Defenseman overall
#1198
Defenseman born in 1988
#3527
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Van Dyk
Castleton · 2010-11
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Cooper
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Ripple
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.