icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Caufield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-02 Country: USA

2019 · Round 1, Pick #15 ·

Montreal Canadiens

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2017-18	—	NTDP-U18	59	54	26	80	1.356	1.0078	1.0166	5.0594	5.1036
2018-19	—	NTDP-U18	64	72	28	100	1.562	1.1614	1.1123	5.8303	5.5840

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2020-21	Wisconsin	D1	BigTen	SO	31	30	22	52	1.677
2019-20	Wisconsin	D1	BigTen	FR	36	19	17	36	1.000

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

1.15

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

1.00

2019-20 · Wisconsin

-13.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 33 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Taylor Cammarata

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG

→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)

0.98 Strong

NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Filimon Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.