IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Belisle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 — NAHL 47 7 13 20 0.425 0.1563 0.1548 0.4491 0.4448
2009-10 — NAHL 26 6 4 10 0.385 0.1413 0.1343 0.4059 0.3857
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 14 1 3 4 0.286
2011-12 Hamline D3 MIAC — 11 5 5 10 0.909
2010-11 Hamline D3 MIAC — 18 4 7 11 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2010-11 · Hamline
+400.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34773
Forward overall
#1144
Forward born in 1989
#3449
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Raphael Lajeunesse
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Martin Gruse
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Walk
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.