IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Hochsprung Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-12-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 56 6 14 20 0.357 0.1268 0.1278 0.3749 0.3778
2009-10 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 57 6 20 26 0.456 0.1620 0.1567 0.4789 0.4634
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Saint John's D3 — SR 21 3 9 12 0.571
2012-13 St. John's D3 — JR 27 11 13 24 0.889
2011-12 St. John's D3 — SO 19 2 6 8 0.421
2010-11 St. John's D3 — FR 25 1 2 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2010-11 · St. John's
-3.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34097
Forward overall
#1108
Forward born in 1989
#3302
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor McBride
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Gallagher
Marian · 2003-04
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Serpico
SUNY Geneseo · 2013-14
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.