IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Hildebrandt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 42 5 4 9 0.214 0.0787 0.0810 0.2262 0.2327
2009-10 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 50 2 12 14 0.280 0.1029 0.1017 0.2955 0.2921
2010-11 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 56 5 9 14 0.250 0.0919 0.0862 0.2639 0.2475
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 23 0 6 6 0.261
2013-14 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 20 0 1 1 0.050
2012-13 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 21 0 4 4 0.191
2011-12 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 24 0 5 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2011-12 · Augsburg
+138.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16885
Defenseman overall
#1685
Defenseman born in 1990
#5248
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kristof Reinthaler
Augsburg · 2008-09
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Heinze
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Doiron
Concordia · 2012-13
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.