IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Heck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Marquette Rangers NAHL 46 3 4 7 0.152 0.0559 0.0541 0.1609 0.1558
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 30 8 7 15 0.500
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 27 12 9 21 0.778
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 28 20 8 28 1.000
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 24 5 6 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+889.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#55870
Forward overall
#1895
Forward born in 1989
#6545
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

L.J. Fellows
Utica · 2013-14
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Linker
Becker · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Avery Smith
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.