IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

L.J. Fellows Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Northern Cyclones EHL 44 4 20 24 0.545 0.1260 0.1235 0.2669 0.2617
2014-15 Northern Cyclones EHL 37 4 24 28 0.757 0.1748 0.1632 0.3703 0.3458
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE — 25 3 9 12 0.480
2017-18 Suffolk D3 CNE — 25 1 4 5 0.200
2016-17 Suffolk D3 CNE — 24 1 7 8 0.333
2015-16 Utica D3 UCHC — 14 1 3 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · Utica
+105.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5167
Defenseman overall
#917
Defenseman born in 1994
#576
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Kirby
Elmira · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bochert
SUNY Morrisville · 2015-16
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Young
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.