IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Andersen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 55 14 17 31 0.564 0.2093 0.2157 0.5967 0.6150
2010-11 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 18 11 29 0.569 0.2111 0.2068 0.6020 0.5898
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 26 20 12 32 1.231
2013-14 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 26 10 9 19 0.731
2012-13 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — SO 30 9 11 20 0.667
2011-12 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — FR 24 10 7 17 0.708
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2011-12 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+293.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18898
Forward overall
#753
Forward born in 1991
#1711
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Smith
Southern New Hampshire · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Alberti
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cayden Kraus
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.