| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Rochester Jr. Americans | USPHL-Premier-Classic | 29 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.310 | 0.0871 | 0.0964 | 0.2551 | 0.2825 |
| 2016-17 | Lone Star Brahmas | NAHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017-18 | — | USHL | 45 | 5 | 17 | 22 | 0.489 | 0.2884 | 0.2761 | 1.4684 | 1.4056 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Lake Superior State | D1 | CCHA | — | 35 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.200 |
| 2021-22 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2020-21 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | SO | 32 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.156 |
| 2018-19 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | FR | 37 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.216 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.