IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Dye Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 52 7 8 15 0.288 0.1025 0.1024 0.3043 0.3039
2010-11 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 43 8 11 19 0.442 0.1570 0.1488 0.4661 0.4417
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 22 2 1 3 0.136
2013-14 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 23 2 3 5 0.217
2012-13 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 24 1 6 7 0.292
2011-12 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 25 2 6 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2011-12 · Bethel
+187.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36745
Forward overall
#1320
Forward born in 1990
#3702
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett LoGelfo
Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Turner
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Crouse
Bethel · 2008-09
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.