IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Tredinnick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Owatonna Express NAHL 33 0 8 8 0.242 0.0891 0.0892 0.2559 0.2563
2010-11 Janesville Jets NAHL 55 5 13 18 0.327 0.1203 0.1144 0.3455 0.3285
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 26 5 9 14 0.538
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 26 8 8 16 0.615
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 27 4 10 14 0.518
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 27 7 11 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2011-12 · Wisconsin-Stout
+646.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43173
Forward overall
#1553
Forward born in 1990
#4724
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Fackey
New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Brazier
Middlebury · 2008-09
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Lloyd
Wentworth · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.