IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Brazier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-09-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Soo Eagles NOJHL 35 23 29 52 1.486 0.2505 0.2355 0.6173 0.5802
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 12 0 2 2 0.167
2011-12 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 26 3 4 7 0.269
2010-11 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Middlebury D3 — FR 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2009-10 · Middlebury
+10.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14531
Forward overall
#640
Forward born in 1988
#31
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mario Bianchi
Concordia · 2014-15
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilson Northey
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Wood
Endicott · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.