| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | U.S. National U17 Team | NTDP-U18 | 61 | 18 | 19 | 37 | 0.607 | 0.4704 | 0.4832 | 2.2577 | 2.3192 |
| 2018-19 | U.S. National U18 Team | NTDP-U18 | 56 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 0.446 | 0.3461 | 0.3379 | 1.6615 | 1.6220 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | GR | 37 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.243 |
| 2023-24 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | SR | 28 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.750 |
| 2022-23 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | JR | 36 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.250 |
| 2021-22 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | — | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.111 |
| 2020-21 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | SO | 27 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.630 |
| 2019-20 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | FR | 36 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 0.472 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.