← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Lindmark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-17 Country: USA
2019 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #137  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 61 18 19 37 0.607 0.4704 0.4832 2.2577 2.3192
2018-19 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 56 11 14 25 0.446 0.3461 0.3379 1.6615 1.6220
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 BigTen GR 37 5 4 9 0.243
2023-24 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 28 11 10 21 0.750
2022-23 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 36 4 5 9 0.250
2021-22 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 9 1 0 1 0.111
2020-21 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 27 4 13 17 0.630
2019-20 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 36 6 11 17 0.472
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2019-20 · Wisconsin
+39.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11593
Forward overall
#509
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ RPI (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.