IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Lindmark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-17 Country: USA
2019 · Round 5, Pick #137  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 61 18 19 37 0.607 0.4509 0.4632 2.2635 2.3251
2018-19 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 56 11 14 25 0.446 0.3318 0.3239 1.6657 1.6261
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 BigTen GR 37 5 4 9 0.243
2023-24 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 28 11 10 21 0.750
2022-23 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 36 4 5 9 0.250
2021-22 Wisconsin D1 BigTen — 9 1 0 1 0.111
2020-21 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 27 4 13 17 0.630
2019-20 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 36 6 11 17 0.472
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2019-20 · Wisconsin
+45.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12050
Forward overall
#556
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Avery Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Luke Stork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Scott Conway
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Atkinson
Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Moncovich
Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Smith
Chatham · 2019-20
1.292 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.