IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tony Giacin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 18 2 2 4 0.222 0.0789 0.0792 0.2333 0.2341
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 26 7 8 15 0.577
2012-13 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 26 6 17 23 0.885
2011-12 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 25 13 11 24 0.960
2010-11 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 20 6 7 13 0.650
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2010-11 · Skidmore
+858.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#49191
Forward overall
#1780
Forward born in 1990
#5615
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell Dolter
St. Olaf · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Doug Clifford
Adrian · 2009-10
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Kreuser
Concordia (WI) · 2016-17
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.