IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 56 15 15 30 0.536 0.1968 0.1913 0.5654 0.5497
2011-12 Texas Tornado NAHL 47 9 20 29 0.617 0.2267 0.2092 0.6512 0.6010
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 28 6 3 9 0.321
2014-15 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 26 2 5 7 0.269
2013-14 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 23 3 5 8 0.348
2012-13 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 25 5 4 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2012-13 · Augsburg
+108.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23349
Forward overall
#848
Forward born in 1991
#1761
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Tzveyn
Aurora · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaun Patry
Salve Regina · 2014-15
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kilty
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.