← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robbie Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Texas Tornado NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 37 1 10 11 0.297 0.0949 0.0946 0.2301 0.2295
2011-12 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 56 9 28 37 0.661 0.2110 0.1996 0.5114 0.4838
2012-13 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 48 4 17 21 0.438 0.1314 0.1183 0.2995 0.2697
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 SR 24 0 6 6 0.250
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 JR 19 2 2 4 0.210
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 SO 26 1 5 6 0.231
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 FR 19 3 5 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2013-14 · SUNY Brockport
+192.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10810
Defenseman overall
#1390
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2018-19
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.