| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Texas Tornado | NAHL | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Smiths Falls Bears | CCHL | 37 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0.297 | 0.0949 | 0.0946 | 0.2301 | 0.2295 |
| 2011-12 | Smiths Falls Bears | CCHL | 56 | 9 | 28 | 37 | 0.661 | 0.2110 | 0.1996 | 0.5114 | 0.4838 |
| 2012-13 | Trenton Golden Hawks | OJHL | 48 | 4 | 17 | 21 | 0.438 | 0.1314 | 0.1183 | 0.2995 | 0.2697 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | — | SR | 24 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.250 |
| 2015-16 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | — | JR | 19 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.210 |
| 2014-15 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | — | SO | 26 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.231 |
| 2013-14 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | — | FR | 19 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.421 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.