IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Singerhouse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 37 7 9 16 0.432 0.1450 0.1489 0.4001 0.4110
2010-11 Owatonna Express NAHL 53 9 29 38 0.717 0.2634 0.2463 0.7568 0.7076
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 23 2 3 5 0.217
2012-13 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 24 4 3 7 0.292
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 26 5 8 13 0.500
2009-10 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 18 5 3 8 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2009-10 · St. Thomas
+248.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24202
Forward overall
#907
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Hayes
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Krill
Williams · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.