IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Frank Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 58 5 25 30 0.517 0.1837 0.1834 0.5430 0.5421
2011-12 Janesville Jets NAHL 57 11 16 27 0.474 0.1683 0.1597 0.4973 0.4719
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 9 0 2 2 0.222
2014-15 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 16 4 4 8 0.500
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 23 0 6 6 0.261
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 28 11 5 16 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2012-13 · Wentworth
+294.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28921
Forward overall
#1015
Forward born in 1991
#2518
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Hellems
Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Finn Theriault
Nazareth · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Herbster
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.