← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Herbster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 56 17 16 33 0.589 0.0984 0.1020 0.2453 0.2542
2018-19 NAHL 60 9 36 45 0.750 0.2756 0.2629 0.7916 0.7551
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 26 10 24 34 1.308
2021-22 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 27 11 16 27 1.000
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA SO 19 4 7 11 0.579
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 19 4 7 11 0.579
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA FR 22 5 9 14 0.636
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 22 5 9 14 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2019-20 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+274.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23315
Forward overall
#1124
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.