IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Obregon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-02-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 51 10 19 29 0.569 0.2020 0.1974 0.5970 0.5833
2011-12 — NAHL 53 18 13 31 0.585 0.2078 0.1928 0.6141 0.5697
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE GR 27 5 7 12 0.444
2013-14 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 27 17 15 32 1.185
2012-13 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 27 12 11 23 0.852
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2012-13 · Johnson & Wales
+411.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23856
Forward overall
#854
Forward born in 1991
#1808
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devon Rice
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivan Galaguzov
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Woolley
Salem State · 2018-19
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.