IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shayne McLaughlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 50 5 14 19 0.380 0.1396 0.1429 0.4011 0.4107
2011-12 — NAHL 56 5 15 20 0.357 0.1312 0.1279 0.3769 0.3673
2012-13 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 24 1 1 2 0.083 0.0306 0.0283 0.0879 0.0813
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 29 7 4 11 0.379
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 26 4 1 5 0.192
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 18 1 3 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Stout
+281.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47790
Forward overall
#1819
Forward born in 1992
#5432
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Landon Adams
Beloit · 2024-25
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Hill
Trine · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
John Wojciechowski
Hamilton · 2023-24
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.