IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Hill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 42 2 5 7 0.167 0.0642 0.0642 0.2426 0.2426
2020-21 — NAHL 47 2 8 10 0.213 0.0782 0.0782 0.2246 0.2246
2021-22 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 60 1 11 12 0.200 0.0735 0.0684 0.2111 0.1965
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA SR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA JR 22 6 3 9 0.409
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA SO 13 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#51658
Forward overall
#3095
Forward born in 2001
#5945
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Miles
Castleton · 2007-08
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Tavare
Bethel · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Regen Cavanagh
Utica · 2017-18
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.