IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Hill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 42 2 5 7 0.167 0.0649 0.0649 0.2431 0.2431
2020-21 — NAHL 47 2 8 10 0.213 0.0790 0.0790 0.2253 0.2253
2021-22 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 60 1 11 12 0.200 0.0743 0.0692 0.2118 0.1972
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA SR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA JR 22 6 3 9 0.409
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA SO 13 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45124
Forward overall
#2144
Forward born in 2001
#5854
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Miles
Castleton · 2007-08
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Regen Cavanagh
Utica · 2017-18
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Tam
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.