IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Sutliffe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fresno Monsters NAHL 57 11 6 17 0.298 0.1107 0.1140 0.3157 0.3252
2011-12 Langley Rivermen BCHL 60 15 17 32 0.533 0.2076 0.2000 0.7777 0.7492
2012-13 Langley Rivermen BCHL 52 15 20 35 0.673 0.2620 0.2400 0.9816 0.8992
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 27 11 10 21 0.778
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 28 7 14 21 0.750
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 28 11 10 21 0.750
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 28 6 9 15 0.536
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2013-14 · St. Scholastica
+179.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18917
Forward overall
#818
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Willis
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Paquette
Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Paul
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.