IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stewart Bell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 9 6 15 0.259 0.0950 0.0983 0.2730 0.2826
2011-12 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 57 6 6 12 0.210 0.0773 0.0762 0.2222 0.2191
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 26 7 7 14 0.538
2014-15 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 26 6 5 11 0.423
2013-14 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 24 5 7 12 0.500
2012-13 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 24 9 11 20 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2012-13 · Tufts
+1044.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#48488
Forward overall
#1852
Forward born in 1992
#5544
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Recchia
Johnson & Wales · 2015-16
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent King
Franklin Pierce · 2022-23
0.241 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Jensen
St. Olaf · 2023-24
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.