IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stewart Bell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 9 6 15 0.259 0.0960 0.0994 0.2738 0.2834
2011-12 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 57 6 6 12 0.210 0.0782 0.0771 0.2229 0.2197
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 26 7 7 14 0.538
2014-15 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 26 6 5 11 0.423
2013-14 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 24 5 7 12 0.500
2012-13 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 24 9 11 20 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2012-13 · Tufts
+1032.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41897
Forward overall
#1712
Forward born in 1992
#5452
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grant Rinke
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Norris
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
JC Humphreys
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.