IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lawrence Childs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-07-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Janesville Jets NAHL 55 9 4 13 0.236 0.0869 0.0866 0.2495 0.2487
2011-12 Janesville Jets NAHL 51 5 8 13 0.255 0.0937 0.0888 0.2690 0.2549
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 27 1 1 2 0.074
2014-15 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 27 1 1 2 0.074
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 27 2 5 7 0.259
2013-14 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 27 2 5 7 0.259
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 2 2 4 0.160
2012-13 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 25 2 2 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2012-13 · Concordia
+112.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46959
Forward overall
#1695
Forward born in 1991
#5319
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payton Schaly
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor McAleer
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bronson Zoltán Kovács
Hobart · 2010-11
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.