IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Granato Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 45 5 3 8 0.178 0.0653 0.0647 0.1877 0.1859
2011-12 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 57 2 9 11 0.193 0.0709 0.0667 0.2037 0.1917
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 21 2 4 6 0.286
2014-15 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 26 0 2 2 0.077
2013-14 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 23 2 7 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2012-13 · Tufts
+593.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#52307
Forward overall
#1910
Forward born in 1991
#6017
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Dysart
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Allen
Middlebury · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Mauser
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.