← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 6 6 12 0.279 0.0838 0.0845 0.2299 0.2319
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 35 8 8 16 0.457 0.1373 0.1318 0.3765 0.3614
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 25 8 6 14 0.560
2018-19 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2017-18 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 20 2 4 6 0.300
2016-17 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 24 5 5 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2016-17 · Middlebury
+331.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34614
Forward overall
#1455
Forward born in 1995
#207
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2017-18
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.