IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 6 6 12 0.279 0.0783 0.0790 0.2295 0.2315
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 35 8 8 16 0.457 0.1283 0.1231 0.3758 0.3607
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Middlebury D1 NESCAC SR 25 8 6 14 0.560
2019-20 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 25 8 6 14 0.560
2018-19 Middlebury D1 NESCAC JR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2018-19 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2017-18 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 20 2 4 6 0.300
2016-17 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 24 5 5 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2016-17 · Middlebury
+361.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#45214
Forward overall
#1946
Forward born in 1995
#214
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cayden Sweitzer
Post · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Soucy
King's · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Lake
Hamline · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.