← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Ellis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-12-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Austin Bruins NAHL 33 4 3 7 0.212 0.0779 0.0793 0.2239 0.2280
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 24 1 7 8 0.333
2013-14 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 22 3 2 5 0.227
2012-13 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#50064
Forward overall
#1818
Forward born in 1991
#5722
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2018-19
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.