IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Hill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 37 4 3 7 0.189 0.0695 0.0716 0.1997 0.2056
2011-12 — NAHL 43 4 10 14 0.326 0.1196 0.1172 0.3437 0.3369
2012-13 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 38 4 16 20 0.526 0.1290 0.1170 0.3624 0.3288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 26 5 14 19 0.731
2015-16 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 8 1 2 3 0.375
2014-15 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 16 0 4 4 0.250
2013-14 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 20 0 7 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2013-14 · Nazareth
+216.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12883
Defenseman overall
#1535
Defenseman born in 1992
#4324
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Martiniello
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Williams
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Anderson
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.