← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 14 1 3 4 0.286 0.0385 0.0385 0.0973 0.0973
2020-21 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 29 9 9 18 0.621 0.0835 0.0835 0.2113 0.2113
2021-22 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 43 27 21 48 1.116 0.1503 0.1388 0.3800 0.3508
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 27 8 9 17 0.630
2024-25 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 25 5 3 8 0.320
2023-24 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 26 9 4 13 0.500
2022-23 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 27 6 2 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2022-23 · Westfield State
+149.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37236
Forward overall
#1635
Forward born in 2001
#1657
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2006-07
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.