← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 14 1 3 4 0.286 0.0374 0.0374 0.0970 0.0970
2020-21 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 29 9 9 18 0.621 0.0812 0.0812 0.2107 0.2107
2021-22 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 43 27 21 48 1.116 0.1460 0.1348 0.3789 0.3498
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 27 8 9 17 0.630
2024-25 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 25 5 3 8 0.320
2023-24 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 26 9 4 13 0.500
2022-23 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 27 6 2 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2022-23 · Westfield State
+156.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21001
Forward overall
#1024
Forward born in 2001
#1410
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2013-14
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.