| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Owatonna Express | NAHL | 23 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0.348 | 0.1291 | 0.1259 | 0.3683 | 0.3592 |
| 2011-12 | Granite City Lumberjacks | NA3HL | 40 | 13 | 22 | 35 | 0.875 | 0.1054 | 0.0952 | 0.2764 | 0.2496 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Bethel | D3 | MIAC | SR | 23 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.174 |
| 2014-15 | Bethel | D3 | MIAC | JR | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.200 |
| 2013-14 | Bethel | D3 | MIAC | SO | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2012-13 | Bethel | D3 | MIAC | FR | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.