IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Geary Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 58 12 13 25 0.431 0.1440 0.1454 0.4001 0.4040
2014-15 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 34 18 13 31 0.912 0.3045 0.2913 0.8464 0.8098
2015-16 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 57 18 17 35 0.614 0.2390 0.2187 0.8954 0.8192
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 24 5 2 7 0.292
2018-19 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 23 3 3 6 0.261
2017-18 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 23 4 3 7 0.304
2016-17 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 17 4 3 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2016-17 · Bowdoin
+94.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15843
Forward overall
#580
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Bullard
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hassan Akl
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.