IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Haydock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 44 2 4 6 0.136 0.0501 0.0511 0.1440 0.1468
2011-12 Chicago Hitmen NAHL 48 8 6 14 0.292 0.1072 0.1040 0.3079 0.2987
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 10 0 4 4 0.400
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 17 3 4 7 0.412
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 24 8 11 19 0.792
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 17 4 4 8 0.471
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Stout
+563.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#48683
Forward overall
#1867
Forward born in 1992
#5567
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Graham Padgitt
New England College · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Puccini
Lake Forest · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.