IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Padgitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 33 0 3 3 0.091 0.0256 0.0256 0.0736 0.0736
2021-22 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 37 2 22 24 0.649 0.0873 0.0844 0.2208 0.2134
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 25 1 6 7 0.280
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 24 1 3 4 0.167
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 26 3 9 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2022-23 · New England College
+479.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
18%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18796
Defenseman overall
#2488
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Penner
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Garvey
Concordia Wisconsin · 2015-16
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Magill-Diaz
Curry · 2016-17
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.