| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 60 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.167 | 0.0649 | 0.0650 | 0.2431 | 0.2435 |
| 2003-04 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 60 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 0.467 | 0.1816 | 0.1738 | 0.6806 | 0.6514 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Wentworth | D3 | — | FR | 24 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.458 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.