IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Roulston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-01-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 — OJHL 48 13 30 43 0.896 0.2503 0.2316 0.6182 0.5721
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Hamilton D3 — SR 25 0 13 13 0.520
2007-08 Hamilton D3 — JR 22 2 11 13 0.591
2006-07 Hamilton D3 — SO 24 4 13 17 0.708
2005-06 Hamilton D3 — FR 26 3 16 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2005-06 · Hamilton
+234.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2407
Defenseman overall
#525
Defenseman born in 1985
#874
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Geoff Fortman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Canisius (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Pryce
Buffalo State · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Woodliffe
Northland · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.