IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Fazio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0463 0.0483 0.1369 0.1427
2011-12 Chicago Hitmen NAHL 51 10 11 21 0.412 0.1463 0.1453 0.4323 0.4295
2012-13 — NAHL 60 18 17 35 0.583 0.2072 0.1954 0.6124 0.5776
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 27 7 7 14 0.518
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 28 1 5 6 0.214
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 28 8 6 14 0.500
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 20 2 2 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2013-14 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+33.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33347
Forward overall
#1261
Forward born in 1992
#3189
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Carlson
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dom Kuziak
Castleton · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Antoine Bélisle
Middlebury · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.