IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Dock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 19 9 5 14 0.737 0.1418 0.1424 0.4643 0.4663
2011-12 — MJHL 58 15 32 47 0.810 0.1560 0.1488 0.5106 0.4871
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 16 1 1 2 0.125
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 21 2 2 4 0.191
2012-13 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 15 1 1 2 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2012-13 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+6.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37575
Forward overall
#1315
Forward born in 1991
#763
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Wendorf
Hamline · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Beauvais
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josiah Roen
Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.