IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Moody Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — MJHL 33 3 5 8 0.242 0.0686 0.0709 0.1527 0.1578
2011-12 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 13 20 33 0.559 0.2077 0.2050 0.5922 0.5845
2012-13 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 55 17 35 52 0.946 0.3511 0.3289 1.0011 0.9378
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 26 4 10 14 0.538
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 29 9 14 23 0.793
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 26 11 12 23 0.885
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 25 2 2 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Stout
-33.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15498
Forward overall
#669
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Enmark
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Ecklund
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Valenti
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.