IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian George Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 60 8 22 30 0.500 0.1837 0.1793 0.5278 0.5153
2012-13 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 46 6 17 23 0.500 0.1837 0.1701 0.5278 0.4888
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 27 6 6 12 0.444
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 28 8 8 16 0.571
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 21 10 7 17 0.809
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 25 6 14 20 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2013-14 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+437.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28187
Forward overall
#1049
Forward born in 1992
#2440
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Norkevicus
Chatham · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Grealish
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Anderson
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.